Disease programmes build capabilities as well as services. HIV programmes develop longitudinal records, medication distribution, adherence support and repeated patient contact. TB programmes build laboratory and contact-tracing systems. Those capabilities can potentially support broader care - but only if integration is deliberate.
Cervical-cancer screening among women living with HIV shows the opportunity clearly. A stable HIV-care relationship can become an entry point for cancer prevention, while chronic-care programmes may also offer infrastructure for hypertension, diabetes or kidney monitoring. DETEC-TB raises a similar systems question around contact networks and primary care. The attraction is obvious: one trusted programme can reduce fragmentation and reach people who would otherwise need multiple disconnected services.
Integration also creates risk. Staff can become overloaded, data systems can become more complicated, and the original disease programme can lose focus. The useful question is therefore not whether vertical programmes are good or bad. It is which capabilities can be shared, under what conditions, and how quality can be protected for every service.
Publications behind this Insight
Primary Health Care and Tanzania’s Double Burden of Disease
Primary Health Care and Tanzania’s Double Burden of Disease. 2025. 10.11604/pamj.supp.2025.52.1.50703.
Open publicationDETEC-TB: Designing Active Case Finding Around Contact Networks
DETEC-TB: Designing Active Case Finding Around Contact Networks. 2025. 10.1186/s12879-025-11797-3.
Open publicationEvidence behind this Insight
- 1. ENHANCE LINKAge programme record. WEMA Project
- 2. Ngowi JE, et al. PHC and Tanzania’s double burden. 2025. DOI 10.11604/pamj.supp.2025.52.1.50703. Primary Health Care and Tanzania’s Double Burden of Disease
- 3. Amour M, et al. DETEC-TB protocol. 2025. DOI 10.1186/s12879-025-11797-3. DETEC-TB: Designing Active Case Finding Around Contact Networks

